Next Page content To those who have not experienced racial profiling or do not know someone who has, it may seem to be nothing more than a mere inconvenience. However, racial profiling is much more than a hassle or an annoyance. It has real and direct consequences.
Should racial profiling be accepted as a law enforcement practice? Introduction Racial profiling stands out as one of the most controversial issues not only in the United States of America but also other parts of the world more so in the developed countries.
Essentially, it encompasses the use of the ethnicity, race or nationality of an individual as the main factor of law enforcement procedures such as random checks, arrest and the like.
In the United States of Americaracial profiling is widely considered by many people as a tool of perpetrating racial discrimination particularly towards people who are drawn from ethnic minorities. There are numerous perspectives that shall come in very handy with regard to the vindication of this assertion; for instance, it serves as a platform for perpetrating the violation of fundamental human rights.
The case example of the Arizona SB law serves as a legal loophole that can contribute directly or indirectly towards the escalation of racial profiling. It is also critically important to highlight the fact that most of the advantages associated with racial profiling are extremely flimsy and as such, its contribution towards the betterment of society is very minimal.
Thesis Statement Racial profiling should not be accepted as a law enforcement practice Main Body The United States of America has a rich history that dates back hundreds of years since the colonial era. Since the attainment of independence, the country has made tremendous advancements in all aspects extending from politics, economy, education, science, agriculture, technology and communication among other aspects.
These developments have not been achieved as a result of an individual rather it has taken the collective efforts of all Americans. In line with this, the issue of racial discrimination is more or less synonymous with the violation of fundamental human rights.
Since the early days of slave trade, Americans have done a lot in order to eradicate all aspects of racial discrimination in the society.
Consequently, it is more or less despicable to envisage a situation whereby racial profiling is accepted as a practice for law enforcement. Prior to examining the various demerits of racial profiling, it is extremely important to evaluate its meaning. Racial Profiling As briefly outlined in the introductory section, racial profiling refers to a situation whereby the race, ethnic background or nationality of an individual is used as a major factor of determining whether to subject him or her to law enforcement procedures.
On the other hand, the enactment of racial profiling seemingly exempts members of specific racial identities or ethnic backgrounds from random law enforcement procedures such as being stopped in traffic.
Implications Of Enactment Of Racial Profiling As A Law Enforcement Practice The enactment or legislation of racial profiling within any given jurisdiction is associated with numerous implications most of which are undesirable within any given society.
To begin with, racial profiling has the potential to create sharp divisions in the society.
This is due to the fact that individuals from certain ethnic backgrounds are considered more valuable as compared to others. For instance, people of Asian descent might feel less valuable as compared to their counterparts of non-Hispanic descent.
Divisions within the society might also arise in terms of social standing; this is whereby the law is perceived as a tool for protecting the affluent or well-off people while discriminating against low or middle income earners.
If the provisions on human rights as enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America are to be enhanced, elements such as racial profiling should not be legalized under any given circumstances. Another important implication of racial profiling is that it might easily result into rebellion within the society; this is whereby minority groups perpetrate violence in retaliation of being discriminated against.
Such attributes are extremely deleterious as far as societal values and co-existence are concerned. Widely considered as the sternest anti-illegal immigration legislation in the United States of Americathis law is aimed at bringing about a sense of zero tolerance towards illegal immigration into Arizona.
One of the stipulations enshrined in the Arizona SB provides that it all aliens must always be in possession of registration documents failure to which they are liable for arrest.
This law has come under extensive scrutiny while also generating unprecedented controversy since it is widely considered as a direct legalization of racial profiling in the State of Arizona.
Even though Jan Brewer, Arizona Governor, has strongly defended her move to enact the law, it has numerous elements of racial profiling. This argument is founded on the rationale that individuals of certain backgrounds such as Muslims are more likely to indulge in terrorism activities as compared to other individuals; consequently, they feel that racial profiling is justified in these kinds of situations.
However, this fact not withstanding, it is of paramount importance to note the fact that virtues are specific for individuals as opposed to an entire race or ethnicity.
It is therefore fundamentally inappropriate to provide security concerns as explanation for the enactment of racial profiling as a law enforcement practice. Conclusion Racial profiling should not be accepted as a law enforcement practice; this is the theme that has been reverberated throughout the paper.
Based on the analysis, several inferences can be made; firstly, there is overwhelming evidence that the beneficial implications of racial profiling are extremely minimal as compared to the undesirable implications.Executive summary.
In August , a Ferguson, Missouri, policeman shot and killed an unarmed black teenager. Michael Brown’s death and the resulting protests and racial tension brought considerable attention to that town. How old is racial profiling? The Free Negro Registry was a means of identifying and tracking so-called Free Persons of Color.
In colonial Virginia, all Free Persons of Color were required to show. Early life. Arpaio was born in Springfield, Massachusetts, on June 14, , to Italian parents, both from Lacedonia, Italy. Arpaio's mother died while giving birth to him, and he was raised by his father, who ran an Italian grocery store.
Arpaio completed high school and worked in his father's business until age 18 when he enlisted in the United States Army. Racial Profiling in America - In today’s world we live in a very media driven manner. The media can sway people’s attitudes towards a certain direction depending on the circumstances.
The Story of Race, Understanding Race, American Anthropological Association, July 13, Since the horrific terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, , Security concerns have understandably increased, but so too has racial profiling, discrimination etc.
Apr 16, · A store manager called the police because the two men were sitting in the store without placing an order. They were arrested for trespassing. The customers said they were waiting for .