Awards are for undergraduate and graduate study, and may be used for education-related expenses, including tuition, fees, books, supplies, room, and board. Students who apply must be a United States citizen or permanent resident with a minimum 2. The scholarship process begins during the first week of September and ends with the scholarship application deadline of Jan.
Posted on December 17, by Scott Alexander I. Some old news I only just heard about: PETA is offering to pay the water bills for needy Detroit families if and only if those families agree to stop eating meat. Predictably, the move caused a backlash.
Of course, this is par for the course for PETA, who have previously engaged in campaigns like throwing red paint on fashion models who wear fur, juxtaposing pictures of animals with Holocaust victims, juxtaposing pictures of animals with African-American slaves, and ads featuring naked people that cross the line into pornography.
Vegan Outreach is an extremely responsible charity doing excellent and unimpeachable work in the same area PETA is. Nobody has heard of them. PETA creates attention, but at a cost.
Vegan Outreach can get everyone to agree in principle that factory-farming is bad, but no one will pay any attention to it. The University of Virginia rape case profiled in Rolling Stone has fallen apart.
In doing so, it joins a long and distinguished line of highly-publicized rape cases that have fallen apart. Studies Lincoln forum essay contest claim that only 2 to 8 percent of rape allegations are false. Yet the rate for allegations that go ultra-viral in the media must be an order of magnitude higher than this.
As the old saying goes, once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action. So why are the most publicized cases so much more likely to be false than the almost-always-true average case?
Several people have remarked that false accusers have more leeway to make their stories as outrageous and spectacular as possible.
But I want to focus on two less frequently mentioned concerns. The Consequentialism FAQ explains signaling in moral decisions like so: When signaling, the more expensive and useless the item is, the more effective it is as a signal. On the other hand, a large diamond is an excellent signal; no one needs a large diamond, so anybody who gets one anyway must have money to burn.
Certain answers to moral dilemmas can also send signals.
For example, a Catholic man who opposes the use of condoms demonstrates to others and to himself! Like the diamond example, this signaling is more effective if it centers upon something otherwise useless.
If the Catholic had merely chosen not to murder, then even though this is in accord with Catholic doctrine, it would make a poor signal because he might be doing it for other good reasons besides being Catholic — just as he might buy eyeglasses for reasons beside being rich.
It is precisely because opposing condoms is such a horrendous decision that it makes such a good signal. But in the more general case, people can use moral decisions to signal how moral they are.
In this case, they choose a disastrous decision based on some moral principle. The more suffering and destruction they support, and the more obscure a principle it is, the more obviously it shows their commitment to following their moral principles absolutely.
For example, Immanuel Kant claims that if an axe murderer asks you where your best friend is, obviously intending to murder her when he finds her, you should tell the axe murderer the full truth, because lying is wrong.
In the same way, publicizing how strongly you believe an accusation that is obviously true signals nothing. Even hard-core anti-feminists would believe a rape accusation that was caught on video. A moral action that can be taken just as well by an outgroup member as an ingroup member is crappy signaling and crappy identity politics.
If you want to signal how strongly you believe in taking victims seriously, you talk about it in the context of the least credible case you can find. A rape that obviously happened?
On the other hand, the controversy over dubious rape allegations is exactly that — a controversy. At each step, more and more people get triggered and upset. Some of those triggered people do emergency ego defense by reblogging articles about how the group that triggered them are terrible, triggering further people in a snowball effect that spreads the issue further with every iteration.
An obviously true rape allegation will only be spread if the response is controversial enough to split people in half along lines corresponding to identity politics — which is why so much coverage focuses on the proposal that all accused rapists should be treated as guilty until proven innocent.
Everybody hates rape just like everybody hates factory farming.tranceformingnlp.com is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want. The Lincoln Forum is pleased to announce its annual “Platt Family Scholarship Prize Essay Contest”.
The essay contest is open to the students who - College, Contest, The Lincoln Forum, Undergraduate, University. Jul 31, · Platt Family Scholarship Prize Essay Contest. 1st Prize $ | 2nd Prize $ | 3rd Prize $ Our Topic for Frederick Douglass, Stephen Douglas, and Abraham Lincoln marks the th anniversary of the famous debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas.
$2, Religious Liberty Essay Scholarship Contest. Site Excerpt: "Each year, the Religious Liberty Essay Scholarship Contest engages high school students in church-state issues by directing them to express a point of view on a religious liberty topic.
This is a list of notable people who have, or have had, major depressive disorder.A number of well-known people have had the disorder.
While depression was sometimes seen as a shameful secret until the s, society has since begun discussing depression more openly. The Lincoln Forum Scholarship Prize Essay Contest is open to full-time undergraduate students.
You must write an essay on the following topic: The Challenge of Holding an Election in the Midst of War.